রবিবার, ২৩ জুন, ২০১৩

Kerry: Russia must back transition in Syria

DOHA, Qatar (AP) ? U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry is pressing hard on Russia to back an international conference intended to end the bloodshed in Syria and allow a transitional government to move the country beyond civil war.

Kerry met with officials from nearly a dozen countries on Saturday in Doha (DOH'-hah), Qatar (GUH'-tur), to discuss aid to the Syrian opposition and push forward on a political resolution to the crisis, which has claimed more than 93,000 lives.

Russia has been the key ally of Syrian President Bashar Assad's regime throughout the two-year conflict.

Kerry says top U.S. diplomats are ready to go to Geneva to meet with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov (SEHR'-gay LAHV'-rahf) and other officials in coming days to advance the political process.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/kerry-russia-must-back-transition-syria-115416828.html

The Lumineers grammys frank ocean Justin Timberlake Grammys jessica biel Lena Dunham elton john

শনিবার, ২২ জুন, ২০১৩

Business Development Sales Management Opportunity ... - Residuals

Manager Leadership Manager Opportunity positions available now!

With 18 years of dynamic growth in the UK we are expecting to quadruple in size during the next 5 years and as a result of that growth we need to expand our Management and Leadership Management team.

We have positions to fill in the following areas; UK, London,Home Counties, Watford, Reading, Basingstoke, Woking, Guildford, Salisbury, Southampton, Portsmouth, Bournmouth, Exeter, Plymouth, Torquay, Maidstone, Gatewick, Crawley, Tunbridge Wells, Scotland, Glasgow Edinburgh.

Here are the benefits of becoming a Manager or Leadership Manager with Global Resources Team International.

A business plan that is tailored to suite your circumstances and your requirements.
Waking up in the morning with a new outlook on life!
Having a work life balance and being there for the family!
Being the boss of your own successful business (please see notes below)!
Creating a full time income income for part time commitment, the package is outstanding!
Getting to a position where your part time income over takes your full time job income!
An opportunity for you to develop an international business in any or all of the 150 countries we operate in!
Creating a residual income (we call it a pension because it carries on when you retire)!
A car plan!
International travel incentives!
Annual profit share incentive!
Creating financial freedom within 2-5 years!
Massive support from a dynamic successful team with 18 years experience at the top!
You will have fun!
You will own your life!

This is an opportunity for you to develop your own business operating from home and starting on a part time basis. If you can find 6-10 hours a week we can help you to develop a part time business with an income that grows to a point where it over takes your full time job income. You will then have a choice, you keep your full time job and carry on with your part time business or you can give up your job and concentrate on your own business part time or full time. This can be achieved within your first 12 months, even starting part time.

There is no high capitol investment to get started, we don?t make money out of recruiting people!
There are no overheads apart from your car and your phone!
You don?t need premises!
You can operate your business from anywhere!
You don?t need to employ anybody!
There is absolutely no risk!
The training and support is second to none. We are one of the few companies in the UK to hold the ?Champion Investors in People? award.

We have a business plan in place with a proven system that will guarantee your success providing you are committed to your goal.
We will give you the support and the complete formula for success absolutely free!
We will be totally committed to working with you until you get to a point where you

Article source: http://jobs.thisisplymouth.co.uk/cgi-bin/vacdetails.pl?selection=946411212

Source: http://residualrx.com/2013/06/22/business-development-sales-management-opportunity-entrepreneurs/

al sharpton actuary elon musk fox mole manson bubba watson recent earthquakes

HTC Creative Director Daniel Hundt on the first-gen iPod, Leica M8 and the quandry of constant social connectivity

HTC Creative Director Daniel on the 1stgen iPod, Leica M8 and the quandry of constant social connection

Every week, a new and interesting human being tackles our decidedly geeky take on the Proustian Q&A. This is the Engadget Questionnaire.

In this week's installment of your smattering of queries, HTC's Creative Director Daniel Hundt chats up the versatile smartphone and responsible consumption. For a look at all of the responses, cozy up on the other side of the break.

Filed under: ,

Comments

Source: http://www.engadget.com/2013/06/21/engadget-questionnaire-htc-creative-director-daniel-hundt/?utm_medium=feed&utm_source=Feed_Classic&utm_campaign=Engadget

Alvin Lee mila kunis hugo chavez jamie lynn spears Chavez Dead Hugo Chavez Dead Bonnie Franklin

Samsung announces five new colors of the Galaxy S4

Galaxy S4 Colors

Step up your style with new color options of the Galaxy S4

We're taking a look at what Samsung has to offer at its Premiere 2013 event live in London, and the manufacturer has just rolled out five new colors of the Galaxy S4. As you can see above, the new colors available are Blue Arctic, Purple Mirage, red Aurora, Brown Autumn and Pink Twilight (yay, pink!).

The colors are matte or pastel rather than glossy, and keep the same shiny plastic on the edges of the device. No specifics just yet on the availability of these colors, but you can expect to see at least a few of them hit your carrier of choice soon.

    


Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/androidcentral/~3/iNdripNopQ8/story01.htm

pat burrell hilary rosen grilled cheese allen west north korea missile don t trust the b in apartment 23 world financial center

শুক্রবার, ২১ জুন, ২০১৩

Atlantic Ocean to Disappear in 200 Million Years?

For youtube videos, paste embed code directly in the text box

-

Members do not need to provide an address

-

Rate Article

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0 Select Comment Validation Method
Member
Name/URL (Guest)
FaceBook (Guest) Member Commenting:


Authenticate with Facebook before submitting

OR


Make your LabSpaces comments count. Start earning LabSpaces points by becoming a member! Learn more. Please verify that you are human: Register for LabSpaces
Make your LabSpaces comments count. Start earning LabSpaces points by becoming a member! Learn more.

Please authenticate before trying to post a comment.

If you would like to remain anonymous, please enter a new name and link below


Friends

Source: http://www.labspaces.net/128727/Atlantic_Ocean_to_Disappear_in_____Million_Years_

tmz Sizzurp the bachelor What is a Jesuit pi day Samsung Galaxy S4 St Francis

Government leads new GM crops push

The government has a duty to explain the benefits of genetically modified crops to the British people, Environment Secretary Owen Paterson is to say.

In a speech today, he will argue that GM has significant benefits for farmers, consumers and the environment.

The UK and Europe risk being left behind unless the technology is embraced, he will say.

But green groups say this new push for GM is dangerous and misguided.

The environment secretary has never made a secret of his support for GM technology. In his speech he will set out the scientific, financial and moral arguments in favour of genetic engineering.

Persuade the public

Mr Paterson will say that GM could be as transformative as the original agricultural revolution - and the UK should be at the forefront.

He will argue that the government, along with industry and the scientific community "owe a duty to the British public to reassure them GM is a safe, proven and beneficial innovation".

"At the moment, Europe is missing out," Mr Paterson will say.

Continue reading the main story

Global GM

Last year about 170 million hectares of GM crops were cultivated in 28 countries. Proponents argue that about half of the GM crops grown worldwide are produced by resource poor farmers. Apart from the US, the world's leading growers are Brazil, Argentina, Canada and India.

"While the rest of the world is ploughing ahead and reaping the benefits of the new technologies, Europe risks being left behind."

The European Union has been deadlocked on GM for a number of years. Only two crops have been approved for commercial growing - another seven are awaiting the green light.

But Mr Paterson is expected to say that member states who are open to the safe use of GM crops should not be prevented from moving forward with the technology.

But critics have been quick to condemn Mr Paterson's view that GM is a "safe, proven and beneficial innovation".

Soil Association policy director Peter Melchett said that GM would make it harder, not easier, to feed the world.

"The British Government constantly claim that GM crops are just one tool in the toolbox for the future of farming. In fact GM is the cuckoo in the nest. It drives out and destroys the systems that international scientists agree we need to feed the world.

"We need farming that helps poorer African and Asian farmers produce food, not farming that helps Bayer, Syngenta and Monsanto produce profits," he added.

Mr Paterson's stance was backed by a number of scientists, including Professor Dale Sanders, the Director of the John Innes Centre in Norwich. He wants to see a greater focus on solving global problems such as malnutrition rather than arguments about one technology or another.

Continue reading the main story

EU spud spat

Only two commercial GM products, have so far been licensed, and neither of them was for human consumption.

One was a type of potato called Amflora developed by German chemical firm BASF. It had been modified to produce more of a type of starch useful for industrial processes.

But in January this year, BASF announced it was withdrawing the product and ending development of all its GM potato varieties.

"Evaluation of potential scientific solutions to agriculture should be evidence-based," he said.

"The overwhelming global conclusion regarding the deployment of GM technologies in the field is that the risks associated with the technologies are infinitesimally small."

Mr Paterson's speech comes in the same week that the National Farmers Union warned that the UK's wheat crop could be 30% smaller than last year because of extreme weather.

The environment secretary will say that GM could "combat the damaging effects of unpredictable weather and disease on crops."

The technology has "the potential to reduce fertiliser and chemical use, improve the efficiency of agricultural production and reduce post-harvest losses. If we use cultivated land more efficiently, we could free up space for biodiversity, nature and wilderness."

At present there are no commercial GM crops grown in the UK although cattle, sheep and pigs are often fed on imported GM. There is only one active GM trial of wheat that has been modified to deter aphids.

Follow Matt on Twitter.

Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-22967571#sa-ns_mchannel=rss&ns_source=PublicRSS20-sa

askew blue moon ann romney Paul Ryan Speech chris cooley chris cooley condoleezza rice

What's Obama's strategy for Syria?

President Barack Obama decided to arm Syria's rebels earlier this week. That sound you are now hearing? Raspberries, both from people who want the US government to throw its full weight behind a rebel victory, and from those who think the US should wait out the Syrian civil war on the sidelines.

Obama has pulled the classic maneuver of a compromise that satisfies no one and irritates everyone. But the decision, and the points of agreement from various analysts who disagree sharply about what the US should be doing, is particularly troubling in what it says about the lack of strategic care going into all of this (one commentator on twitter said it was looking like an "etch-a-sketch intervention.")

Does President Obama have a strategic objective in mind? He hasn't outlined one in public yet, and it's hard to divine one amid the morass of unnamed sources quoted in DC press reporting on the decision.

RECOMMENDED: Obama, Putin in stare-down over (no, not the Super Bowl ring) Syria war (+video)

Sure, the US would like a stable, democratic Syria that's friendly to America and Israel, hostile to Sunni jihadis and the Shiite movement Hezbollah, and distant from Iran. Obama says he'd like to see a negotiated, political transition - notwithstanding both sides are committed to victory and nothing but victory. But that is just an empty aspiration if there isn't a meaningful road-map for getting from point A to point Z. That's not to say the US must have an answer to this question, or even that there's a plausible one to be found. Sometimes the best you can hope for is to ride the tiger and limit the fallout for your own interests.

But best practice in those kind of situations is to not to get involved in the conflict at all. Simply pouring more weapons into the situation and hoping for the best isn't a smart option. And if the Obama administration has cracked the code, or thinks it has, it's time it starts sharing that with the American public before the US risks getting dragged into another Middle Eastern war.

What's more, the limited amount of support currently on offer is highly unlikely to lead to anything resembling a decisive advantage for the rebellion writ large, particularly if the US is successful in keeping the new weapons out of the hands of jihadi groups like Jabhat al-Nusra - among the most effective fighters on the opposition side.

Criticism of Obama's decision have been pointed - both from people who want a robust US effort to help the rebels win, and from those who think the US should steer clear entirely. Shadi Hamid is in the former camp, and he writes that:

What makes Obama's decision so unsatisfying -- and even infuriating -- to both sides is that even he seems to acknowledge this. As the New York Times reports, "Mr. Obama expressed no confidence it would change the outcome, but privately expressed hope it might buy time to bring about a negotiated settlement."

To some extent like the 2010 Afghanistan "surge," this is a tactical move that seems almost entirely detached from any clear, long-term strategy. A source of constant and sometimes Kafkaesque debate among interpreters of Obama's Syria policy is figuring out what exactly the policy is in the first place. Secretary of State John Kerry has been promoting the Geneva II peace conference, but his explanations of US goals have tended to confuse. For example, there is this: "The goal of Geneva II is to implement Geneva I." But no one is quite sure what the goals of Geneva I were, except perhaps to "lay the groundwork" for Geneva II.

George Washington University's Marc Lynch, an occasional adviser to the administration on Middle East foreign policy who would like to see the US limit it's military involvement in the war, writes the decision to send weapons is probably Obama's "worst foreign policy decision since taking office."

Nobody in the administration seems to have any illusions that arming the rebels is likely to work. The argument over arming the FSA has been raging for well over a year, driven by the horrific levels of death and devastation, fears of regional destabilization, the inadequacy of existing policies, concerns about credibility over the ill-conceived chemical weapons red line, and a relentless campaign for intervention led by hawkish media, think tanks, Congress, and some European and regional allies.

... Obama's move is likely meant as a way to "do something," and perhaps to give Secretary John Kerry something to work with diplomatically on the way to Geneva II, while deflecting pressure for more aggressive steps. The logic behind the steps has been thoroughly aired by now. The dominant idea is that these arms will help to pressure Assad to the bargaining table, strengthen the "moderate" groups within the opposition while marginalizing the jihadists in the rebellion's ranks, and assert stronger U.S. leadership over the international and regional proxy war. Much of it sounds like magical thinking.

Earlier this week columnist Jeffrey Goldberg reported that Gen. Martin Dempsey dressed down Secretary Kerry over the apparent absence of clear objectives and the danger of directly attacking the Syrian government. Mr. Goldberg cites this only to "several sources" with no further identification, so the usual caveats apply as to the motives and honesty of the anonymous. But if true, it's a fascinating window into the debate between the professional soldiers and civilian leaders in the Obama administration.

At a principals meeting in the White House situation room, Secretary of State John Kerry began arguing, vociferously, for immediate U.S. airstrikes against airfields under the control of Bashar al-Assad?s Syrian regime -- specifically, those fields it has used to launch chemical weapons raids against rebel forces.

It was at this point that the current chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the usually mild-mannered Army General Martin Dempsey, spoke up, loudly. According to several sources, Dempsey threw a series of brushback pitches at Kerry, demanding to know just exactly what the post-strike plan would be and pointing out that the State Department didn?t fully grasp the complexity of such an operation.

Dempsey informed Kerry that the Air Force could not simply drop a few bombs, or fire a few missiles, at targets inside Syria: To be safe, the U.S. would have to neutralize Syria?s integrated air-defense system, an operation that would require 700 or more sorties. At a time when the U.S. military is exhausted, and when sequestration is ripping into the Pentagon budget, Dempsey is said to have argued that a demand by the State Department for precipitous military action in a murky civil war wasn?t welcome.

... Dempsey was adamant: Without much of an entrance strategy, without anything resembling an exit strategy, and without even a clear-eyed understanding of the consequences of an American airstrike, the Pentagon would be extremely reluctant to get behind Kerry?s plan.

The talk of many of the purveyors of conventional DC wisdom about all this is instructive in its fundamental incoherence. Consider the musings of David Ignatius yesterday about the White House's plans.

In Ignatius' estimation "the reality is that, despite his decision last week to arm the opposition there, Obama is still playing for a negotiated diplomatic transition" and that "Obama wants to bolster moderate opposition forces under Gen. Salim Idriss until they?re strong enough to negotiate a transitional government. He wants to counter recent offensives by Hezbollah and other Iranian-backed forces aiding President Bashar al-Assad. And he wants to keep Arab nations from bolting the U.S.-led coalition backing Idriss and instead arming radical jihadists."

It's hard to know where to start with the above. Some Arab nations already are arming jihadis, and the efforts to arm the "nice" rebels exclusively haven't worked, with strong evidence that weapons that started to flow through Jordan at the end of last year quickly ended up in the hands of jihadi fighters, who have been an enormous battlefield asset to the uprising.

Strong enough to "negotiate a transitional government?" That in reality would be "strong enough to win." Assad and his supporters view the fight as one for existence and survival, have the backing of Iran and Russia, and see little upside in negotiating a "transition" that ends up with them in exile or swinging from the gallows. If Assad doesn't fear imminent defeat, he isn't going to negotiate his exit. And rebel commanders, both under the banner of the Free Syrian Army and of the jihadis, have been united in demanding Assad's removal from power as a precondition for any meaningful peace talks.

Finally, it's unclear what the sending of light weapons - Obama has been frustratingly vague on what exactly he's willing to give them, and it will take a while to set up supply routes and vetting procedures - will do to substantially change the situation. The Syrian army is professional and well-equipped; Hezbollah is one of the most capable fighting forces in the region. Without anti-tank weapons and anti-aircraft weapons - and professional training in their use - it's hard to see extra bullets or rifles making much of a difference beyond, perhaps, prolonging the agony.

Meanwhile, Russia looks on. President Vladimir Putin drew his own red line this week over any kind of no-fly or no-drive zone over Syria. His country continues to hold back on a promised delivery of the advanced S-300 anti-aircraft system to Assad that has alarmed Israel and the US. The greater the US slips towards a policy of regime change, the more likely he is to deliver those and perhaps other weapons.

RECOMMENDED: Obama, Putin in stare-down over (no, not the Super Bowl ring) Syria war (+video)

Related stories

Read this story at csmonitor.com

Become a part of the Monitor community

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/whats-obamas-strategy-syria-161644717.html

Dancing With the Stars 2013 NIT Bracket March Madness 2013 bracket March Madness 2013 selection sunday NIT Tournament clay matthews

Carbon nanotube harpoon catches individual brain-cell signals

June 19, 2013 ? Neuroscientists may soon be modern-day harpooners, snaring individual brain-cell signals instead of whales with tiny spears made of carbon nanotubes.

The new brain cell spear is a millimeter long, only a few nanometers wide and harnesses the superior electromechanical properties of carbon nanotubes to capture electrical signals from individual neurons.

"To our knowledge, this is the first time scientists have used carbon nanotubes to record signals from individual neurons, what we call intracellular recordings, in brain slices or intact brains of vertebrates," said Bruce Donald, a professor of computer science and biochemistry at Duke University who helped developed the probe.

He and his collaborators describe the carbon nanotube probes June 19 in PLOS ONE.

"The results are a good proof of principle that carbon nanotubes could be used for studying signals from individual nerve cells," said Duke neurobiologist Richard Mooney, a study co-author. "If the technology continues to develop, it could be quite helpful for studying the brain."

Scientists want to study signals from individual neurons and their interactions with other brain cells to better understand the computational complexity of the brain.

Currently, they use two main types of electrodes, metal and glass, to record signals from brain cells. Metal electrodes record spikes from a population of brain cells and work well in live animals. Glass electrodes also measure spikes, as well as the computations individual cells perform, but are delicate and break easily.

"The new carbon nanotubes combine the best features of both metal and glass electrodes. They record well both inside and outside brain cells, and they are quite flexible. Because they won't shatter, scientists could use them to record signals from individual brain cells of live animals," said Duke neurobiologist Michael Platt, who was not involved in the study.

In the past, other scientists have experimented with carbon nanotube probes. But the electrodes were thick, causing tissue damage, or they were short, limiting how far they could penetrate into brain tissue. They could not probe inside individual neurons.

To change this, Donald began working on a harpoon-like carbon-nanotube probe with Duke neurobiologist Richard Mooney five years ago. The two met during their first year at Yale in the 1976, kept in touch throughout graduate school and began meeting to talk about their research after they both came to Duke.

Mooney told Donald about his work recording brain signals from live zebra finches and mice. The work was challenging, he said, because the probes and machinery to do the studies were large and bulky on the small head of a mouse or bird.

With Donald's expertise in nanotechnology and robotics and Mooney's in neurobiology, the two thought they could work together to shrink the machinery and improve the probes with nano-materials.

To make the probe, graduate student Inho Yoon and Duke physicist Gleb Finkelstein used the tip of an electrochemically sharpened tungsten wire as the base and extended it with self-entangled multi-wall carbon nanotubes to create a millimeter-long rod. The scientists then sharpened the nanotubes into a tiny harpoon using a focused ion beam at North Carolina State University.

Yoon then took the nano-harpoon to Mooney's lab and jabbed it into slices of mouse brain tissue and then into the brains of anesthetized mice. The results show that the probe transmits brain signals as well as, and sometimes better than, conventional glass electrodes and is less likely to break off in the tissue. The new probe also penetrates individual neurons, recording the signals of a single cell rather than the nearest population of them.

Based on the results, the team has applied for a patent on the nano-harpoon. Platt said scientists might use the probes in a range of applications, from basic science to human brain-computer interfaces and brain prostheses.

Donald said the new probe makes advances in those directions, but the insulation layers, electrical recording abilities and geometry of the device still need improvement.

Source: http://feeds.sciencedaily.com/~r/sciencedaily/most_popular/~3/7OztY2ISM84/130619195129.htm

marlins marlins facebook buys instagram kevin systrom fibonacci sequence maryland lottery grand jury

a new opinion in Sports about Masters Golf Scoop Retriever

Don't get me wrong. I like a good giggle as well as the next man and I'm not beyond a bit of smutty innuendo from time to time. But. let's face it, losing your balls is no laughing matter.

It isn't so much the money - although golf balls can cost a pretty penny. It's the pride. When I started out a ball that survived the full eighteen holes with me went straight in the trophy cabinet. Admittedly, we're unlikely to hear Tiger Woods boast that he came back with the same ball he started with, but then he's probably given truck loads every week ....and anyway he has people out on the course who search for him (for his balls, that is).

The truth is that this is a fact of life for golfers. You're going to lose balls. You'll lose them in neighbouring fields and gardens, through windows, in ponds and rivers and deep, dark gorse bushes; I've even known large birds to abscond with them.

The Masters Golf Ball Scoop is a very handy way of retrieving your balls from tricky situations, although probably less successful with the large bird scenario and something the RSPB would frown upon, given the relative sizes of the scoop and a bird's gullet.

O________What Is This Thing? ________O

The scoop retriever is one of several ball retrieval systems that the golfer could carry in his bag. Nearly all of them have one feature in common, which is a telescopic pole. These can be as long as fifteen feet, but my version of the Masters Scoop extends to nine feet, which in my view is a good length to get into most awkward spots, while still giving you control. Those fifteen feet chaps can be a little bit wobbly when fully extended. I think most of us feel a little bit wobbly when fully extended, don't we? It's understandable. To make them stiffer would mean adding weight, and none of us wants extra weight in the bag, especially when carrying.

The pole has a plastic grip and lower section, with two further metal sections that twist to unlock and extend. The metal cage/scoop tilts backwards and forwards and there is a prong that will hold a golf ball in place if the scoop is turned upside down.

This kind of retriever is especially useful in water. Some retrievers need to press against a ball and a firmer surface to engage. In water, where the ball is possibly lying on very soft silt this becomes very difficult, whereas the scoop will pick up the ball quite easily, the water and silt quickly running away through the cage.

That doesn't mean to say that the scoop isn't just as effective in a gorse bush, or through a barbed wire fence into a field. It's a very handy instrument.

O_________ Cost and Value _________O

This cost me ?8.99 online, which is terrific value when you consider that most golf balls cost at least ?1.00 each. I've only to retrieve nine golf balls (and they need not necessarily have been mine in the first place) and I've made my money back. I can tell you that I shall retrieve many more than that in the lifetime of the scoop.

Another advantage is not to do with money, but with safety. Sometimes a golfer will pursue his ball down a slippery river bank, struggling for a foothold and clinging precariously to bits of bush and tree. With the scoop he might not have to do that. He might not have to venture into the field with the bull, and as for gorse...please....it's too painful.

There may be sturdier, longer and certainly more expensive retrievers out there, but this one, at the price, will do very nicely for me, thank you.

Summary: An essential part of a golfer's kit.

Source: http://www.dooyoo.co.uk/golf/masters-golf-scoop-retriever/1710732/

torn acl derrick rose injury st louis news correspondents dinner i am legend san antonio spurs greta van susteren

In surprise, House defeats farm bill with big food stamp cuts (reuters)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Politics - Top Stories News, RSS Feeds and Widgets via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/314112947?client_source=feed&format=rss

stacy francis tournament brackets 2012 ncaa basketball tournament walt what time is it current time a thousand words

Autophaser improves sample analysis in areas such as cancer, Alzheimer's and oil spills

June 20, 2013 ? A new software package allows researchers to vastly improve the performance of one of the key tools used to analyse medical and environmental samples.

Autophaser, developed by the University of Warwick and Aberystwyth University, enables researchers to make use of significantly more data when using Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometers (FT-ICR MS).

FT-ICR is a powerful tool for identifying chemicals and biochemical components in complex mixtures and is used by scientists analysing substances across a wide range of sectors including medical, environmental, and commercial areas such as the petroleum industry.

The software, which is free for academic purposes, will allow much greater confidence in interpreting results. For commercial purposes, the software is available to licence from Warwick Ventures, the commercial arm of the University of Warwick.

The normal method of processing data from FT-ICR MS -- magnitude mode -- effectively ignores half of the information generated, so mass accuracy and resolution are not as high as they could be.

However Autophaser allows researchers to make use of this otherwise discarded data by converting FT-ICR MS results to absorption mode. This gives an improvement in spectral resolution of up to three times and a 41% improvement in the signal-to-noise ratio.

Using Autophaser, researchers will see more peaks in the spectrum, get better sequence coverage in proteins and have more confidence in peak assignments.

Dr David Kilgour of the Department of Chemistry at the University of Warwick said: "Major decisions are made every day in commercial, medical, and environmental settings on the basis of FT-ICR MS so it's vital that researchers have access to the most accurate processing methods.

"Autophaser unleashes the full potential of this type of mass spectrometry and really pushes back the barriers to the kinds of problems it can tackle.

"By making this software available for free to academic researchers, we envisage its benefits will be felt across many biomedical areas, for example cancer, Alzheimer's, and Parkinson's, the pharmaceutical and polymer industries, as well as in environmental analysis such as detecting pollution after oil spills."

Although the advantages of absorption mode FT-ICR MS have been known for nearly 40 years, the technique is still not widely used because a key mathematical hurdle presented a barrier.

The researchers at the University of Warwick and Aberystwyth University solved the problem using a kind of artificial intelligence known as a genetic algorithm.

The research behind the software was conducted by David Kilgour and Peter O'Connor at the University of Warwick and Mark Neal at Aberystwyth University; based on earlier work by Peter O'Connor and a student in his group, Yulin Qi.

Autophaser was recently presented at the American Society for Mass Spectrometry annual conference in the US.

Source: http://feeds.sciencedaily.com/~r/sciencedaily/computers_math/information_technology/~3/YSf4sS3WGIo/130620111206.htm

The Lumineers grammys frank ocean Justin Timberlake Grammys jessica biel Lena Dunham elton john

NYC heir, 89, may go to prison Fri. in theft case

NEW YORK (AP) ? An 89-year-old heir convicted of helping himself to his mother's fortune appears to be on the verge of going to a New York prison after years of appeals.

Anthony Marshall, the son of the late philanthropist Brooke Astor, was due in court Friday afternoon. His lawyer, Kenneth Warner, said Thursday evening that Marshall would have to surrender because an appeals court had turned down a request for bail during further appeals; information wasn't immediately available from the court.

The case has involved lots of legal maneuvering, and it wasn't immediately clear whether Marshall may have further avenues to try to forestall his one-to-three-year prison term, which his lawyers and doctors have said could kill him. His health was already poor when he was sentenced and has "seriously deteriorated in the 3 ? years since," his attorney Kenneth Warner said.

Marshall's co-defendant, Francis Morrissey Jr., was led away in handcuffs Thursday to start serving the sentence imposed on both men in December 2009, after a trial that examined the finances and final years of the woman seen as the epitome of New York society.

Astor ? whose third husband was a descendant of one of the one of the United States' first multimillionaires, John Jacob Astor ? was renowned for her gifts to a roster of New York institutions. She was 105 when she died in 2007; she had been diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease.

The Manhattan district attorney's office said Marshall, her only child, exploited her mental decline to use her money to give himself gifts and to mastermind changes to her will. His lawyers said that he had legal authority for the gifts and that Astor deliberately altered her will.

Marshall was excused from court Thursday, but some jurors were on hand as a downcast Morrissey, 72, heard that he would have to go to prison. Morrissey was convicted of forging Astor's signature on a change to her will. His defense argued that if the signature was phony, he knew nothing of it.

Some jurors marveled after court at the time the appeals have taken.

"I thought I was done with this four years ago," juror Larry Kaagan said.

Morrissey's lawyers indicated they would continue an appeal that hinges on a juror's statements that she was intimidated into a conviction by another juror's curses and hostile gestures.

An appeals court said Judi DeMarco's assertions didn't warrant overturning a verdict she stood behind in court. But defense lawyers want the issue revisited because DeMarco recently swore to her account, which she'd previously told to a defense investigator.

The trial judge, Manhattan state Supreme Court Justice A. Kirke Bartley, was unmoved Thursday.

Having prosecuted mob boss John Gotti in the 1980s, "I know something of fear and intimidation," Bartley said. "And it simply does not exist in this case."

___

Follow Jennifer Peltz at http://twitter.com/jennpeltz

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/nyc-heir-89-may-prison-fri-theft-case-061927606.html

joseph kony 2012 arian foster dennis kucinich apple ipad kony kony 2012 jim irsay

বৃহস্পতিবার, ২০ জুন, ২০১৩

Youth leagues try to rein in 'bad news parents'

BUFFALO GROVE, Ill. (AP) ? No parent here has rushed onto a playing field to jump a referee who made an unpopular call. No adult has gotten angry and slugged or pushed a coach or a young player, as has happened elsewhere. Nor have there been any of those embarrassing sideline brawls you sometimes see posted on online video sites.

At least nobody's admitting to it.

Still, parent behavior in this quiet suburb north of Chicago has been questionable enough to cause the park district officials to post new signs at ball fields with what you might call . a few gentle reminders.

"This is a game being played by children," the signs in the Buffalo Grove Park District begin, with the words "game" and "children" highlighted in bold letters. "If they win or lose every game of the season, it will not impact what college they attend or their future potential income.."

The campaign, which began this month, is relatively low-key. You might not even notice the small blue signs if you weren't standing right by them. But they speak to a growing movement in youth sports ? aimed at reining in parents who, many say, are too involved, too competitive and in need of a little perspective.

"I just want to get back to what I was brought up with as a child ? and that's, 'Let the kids play,'" says Dan Schimmel, the park district's executive director.

Elsewhere, some youth sports leagues are requiring parents to sign codes of conduct or recite pledges before games, promising in front of their children that they'll behave. If they slip up, they might be pulled aside for a conversation or kicked out of a game if a warning does no good.

Other leagues occasionally have "silent" games, where parents and sometimes even coaches can only offer encouragement or cheer and clap, but can't direct the young players or say or shout anything too negative.

Buffalo Grove officials say some have questioned whether this is just another attempt to coddle children. Some wonder: Shouldn't a young player learn to take criticism? And what's wrong with a little competition, anyway?

But this, say coaches, leagues and even some parents and kids, is about parent behavior that increasingly goes way over the line and interferes with a kid's ability to enjoy something that's supposed to be fun.

"We've all seen that person on the sidelines and we're thinking, 'Are they really going there? Really?'" says Brian Sanders, president of i9 Sports Corp., a national franchiser of youth leagues and camps based in Florida that uses sportsmanship as one of its cornerstones.

In some cases, violent behavior has led to criminal charges ? in Newark, N.J., for instance, where parents allegedly beat up a Little League baseball umpire because he wouldn't call a game because of darkness.

"The level of competition in youth sports has gotten exponentially greater, forcing this level of hyper-competition," Sanders says.

"I think that is driving a certain level of behavior on the sidelines that is amplified."

Haley Small, a 19-year-old college student who played soccer and then traveling softball through high school, puts it this way: "The more competitively I played, the more interesting the parents got."

"We'd joke about it, but it's serious. Some of my friends were walking on eggshells," says Small, now a student at Ithaca College in New York. "We hear a lot more than people think."

It gets so bad sometimes that some players wish their parents would just stay home, she says.

Laura Marinelli, who coaches Small's younger sister on a traveling softball team for 12- to 14-year-old girls in Essex County, N.J., also has noticed more over-the-top parent behavior in recent years.

Marinelli recalls one dad who was angry about a play on the field and tried to tackle her assistant coach during a game. The coach was able to duck the parent and ended up throwing him to the ground.

At a national tournament last year, she says a father of a player was so unhappy with a decision she'd made that he ran at her in the dugout, screaming and pointing in her face, causing some of her players to cry. Ultimately, she asked his daughter to leave the team because she felt the dad had repeatedly violated the team's code of conduct.

"The girl is a phenomenal softball player. She's a sweetheart ? and a great kid," Marinelli says. "But I can't have a parent like that on the sidelines."

Kicking kids off teams is one of the more serious punishments that leagues and coaches use to try to keep parents under control. Some leagues and tournament officials also are giving umpires more power to warn offending parents and coaches and then ask them to leave the premises if they ignore the warning.

It can be an effective deterrent, though in many other instances, umpires or referees at youth games are often teenagers who may not have the experience or confidence to stand up to parents.

And often, there's no security at games. So parents are left to police themselves.

For that reason, some teams assign parents to be "culture keepers," asking those people to help keep the yelling and negativity from fellow parents to a minimum. Sometimes, they even hand out lollipops to help keep themselves quiet.

"But sometimes the culture keeper isn't always the best person ? because that person is yelling just as much as the other parents," Jill Kirby says, laughing. She's a mom in Long Grove, Ill., whose five children participate in sports, from soccer to swimming and T-ball, sometimes in neighboring Buffalo Grove.

She says the signs asking adults to behave are a nice idea ? perhaps even a way to get people talking about the issue. But ultimately, she doesn't think the tactic will work.

"I think the worst offenders don't think they are the worst offenders," Kirby says, conceding that maybe even she was one of those parents, "once upon a time."

"And then I got a little perspective," she says.

Greg Dale, a sports psychologist at Duke University, agrees that it's difficult for parents to see themselves as "that parent," at least without a little help.

He recalls a mom in California telling him about a dad she called "leather lungs" because he yelled so often at the officials, coaches and kids.

Hesitant to approach him, the woman secretly filmed him at several games and anonymously sent him the video. "And the guy changed the way he was acting from then on," Dale says.

More often, though, he says he sees parents who "say the right things" about sportsmanship ? maybe even reciting a pledge before a game, as is the case at his own children's Little League games.

"Those things help. But ultimately, I think they're Band-Aids," says Dale, author of the book "The Fulfilling Ride: A Parent's Guide to Helping Athletes Have a Successful Sport Experience."

More important, he says is whether parents are actually BEING good sports, even at professional sporting events.

"As parents, we have to model the lessons we want our kids want to learn," he says.

There are other good reasons not to interfere, says Malcolm Brown, a high school and club soccer coach in Westchester County, N.Y.

One of his teams has instituted very occasional "silent Sunday" games. But he'd like to have them more often because he says they make his players better ? and more able to make decisions on their own.

"Too often during games, they're looking to the side for direction," he says of this generation of young athlete. "They become robots. They can never become good in soccer because soccer demands the imagination and creativity of the player."

Wendy Grolnick, a psychology professor at Clark University in Massachusetts, sees why silent games could be useful. But she also says coaches and leagues shouldn't punish all parents because some are overzealous.

"We don't want to just shut people up and make them feel like they can't say anything," says Grolnick, who wrote the book "Pressured Parents, Stressed-Out Kids: Dealing with Competition While Raising a Successful Child."

She recalls her own experience at meetings for parents when her daughters have played field hockey and tennis in college.

A lot of those meetings focused on "what not to do," she says. "It could feel a little insulting.. We need to feel like partners in the process."

But there's a happy medium, even for the most well-intentioned parents ? and even when they're not yelling or fighting ? says Mike Cherenson, a youth sports coach who founded a lacrosse league in his town, Pequannock, N.J.

He tells the story of a first-grade soccer game, when a young goalie was having trouble stopping the ball. Her mom ran onto the field to block it for her.

"Everyone had a good laugh ? no harm, no foul," Cherenson says. "But I think it does depict a larger problem.

"There seems to be an inability to separate yourself from your child."

____

Online:

Sports Etiquette for Parents: http://takingyoubeyondthegame.blogspot.ca/2010/03/soccer-sideline-etiquette-for-parents.html?spref=tw

____

Martha Irvine is an AP national writer. She can be reached at mirvine@ap.org or at http://twitter.com/irvineap

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/youth-leagues-try-rein-bad-news-parents-070440309.html

andy kaufman tom watson kawasaki disease resurrection masters tickets one direction tulsa news